MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7139559660

Review of <i>Archbishop A.-A. Tache of St. Boniface: The "GoodFight" and the Illusive Vision</i> By Raymond J. A.Hue!

2004· article· W7139559660 on OpenAlexaffabout
Robert Choquette

Bibliographic record

VenueLincoln (University of Nebraska) · 2004
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetisPoliticsSisterBiographyDream
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alexandre Tache, one of the very first Canadians to join the French Missionary Oblates of Mary Immaculate who arrived in Canada in 1841, was sent to work in Canada's Northwest in 1845 where he became second bishop of St. Boniface in 1853, and later archbishop. He remained there until his death in 1894, a half-century during which the region was transformed from a vast hunting emporium for furs to a refuge for tens of thousands of Canadian, American, and European settlers brought into the area after 1860 on the rapidly expanding tracks of American and then Canadian railways. Tache built up the Catholic Church of the Northwest to include dozens of missionary stations, infirmaries, hospitals, day schools, and boarding schools, in addition to a college, a mission-supply network, and small newspapers. In the process, he became a leading player in the social and political controversies of the period, including the Red River uprising (1869-70) and Northwest Rebellion( 1884-85) led by Metis leader Louis Riel, and the Manitoba schools question (1890 ff.), political controversies that became national issues in Canada. Raymond Huel has written a thoroughly researched and documented biography of Tache, one that will no doubt become a necessary reference for anyone seeking to understand the man and his times. He emphasizes Tache's vision, his dream of building a new Quebec in the Canadian West, a sister province to the French and Catholic Province of Quebec. While there are no significant new discoveries here, and the text at times is repetitive, the book constitutes good, solid, and thorough reporting. In the mass of factual details that are noted, this reader spotted only two errors, the first when the Sisters of Charity are said to have arrived in Red River in 1841, rather than 1844, the second when the American General Douglas MacArthur is said to have belonged to the US Marine Corps, rather than the US Army. Huel is harsh in his judgment of Tache, a man who has often been presented as larger than life by hagiographic writers. We are told repeatedly that he was lacking in leadership and interpersonal skills, an authoritarian deficient in the charisma and charm necessary to win people over to his point of view. Some may consider Huel overly severe in this regard.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.972
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0110.015
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLincoln (University of Nebraska)Same topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207