Bibliographic record
Abstract
Surnames and Genetic Structure. By Gabriel Ward Lasker. (With maps and diagrams prepared by C.G.N. Mascie-Taylor, A.J. Boyce, and G. Brush.) viii + 148 pp. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985. $24.95. (Reviewed by John M. McCullough, University of Utah) Sewall Wright and Evolutionary Biology. By William B. Provine, xvi + 545 pp. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, 1986. $30.00. (Reviewed by J.N. Spuhler, University of New Mexico) Adaptational Biology. Molecules to Organisms. By C. Ladd Prosser, ix + 784 pp. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1986. $49.50. (Reviewed by Michael B. Coughenour, Colorado State University) African Pygmies. Edited by L.L. Cavalli-Sforza. xxxiv + 461 pp. Academic Press, Orlando, 1986. $39.95. (Reviewed by Robert C. Bailey, University of California) Fitness of a Nation. Lessons from the Canada Fitness Study. By R.J. Shephard. 186 pp. Karger, Basel, 1986. $98.00. (Reviewed by Bertis B. Little, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Dallas) The Bronze Age Harappans. A Bio-Anthropological Study of the Skeletons Discovered at Harappa. By P.C. Dutta. xi + 157 pp. Anthropological Survey of India, Government of India, Calcutta, 1983. $12.50. (Reviewed by Kenneth A.R. Kennedy, Cornell University)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.506 | 0.484 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".