Reduced chemokine and matrix metalloproteinase expression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis achieving remission
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the changes in synovial expression of mediators of macrophage chemotaxis, matrix degradation, and macrophage infiltration in the synovial membrane of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) defined remission and radiological arrest. METHODS: Knee synovial biopsies were taken from a selected group of 18 patients with RA before and after treatment and immunostained with antibodies specific for CD68; the chemokines macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1a and monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1; matrix metalloproteinases (MMP-1 and 3) and their inhibitors, the tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMP-1 and 2); as well as isotype-specific negative controls. Immunostaining was quantified using a computer assisted color video image analysis system. Radiographs were performed before and after treatment and the Larsen score determined. Patients were arbitrarily divided into 2 groups: the radiological arrest group (defined as change in Larsen score pound 5 from baseline) and radiological progressors (defined as change in Larsen score > 5). Patients were classified according to ACR response criteria. RESULTS: In the 8 patients who achieved ACR defined remission, there were tendencies toward reductions in the synovial lining layer (LL) expression of MIP-1a by 36% (p = 0.1) and MCP-1 by 48% (p = 0.1). Significant reductions occurred in the expression of MMP-1, by 53% in the LL (p = 0.008) and 59% in synovial sublining layer (SL) (p = 0.02) and MMP-3, by 76% in LL (p = 0.02), and 72% in SL (p = 0.008), but not in TIMP expression. In this group of patients there were reductions in MMP:TIMP ratios, in particular the MMP-1:TIMP-1 ratio in the LL (p = 0.05), MMP-3:TIMP-1 ratio in the LL (p = 0.05) and SL (p = 0.008), and MMP-3:TIMP-2 ratio in the LL (p = 0.04) and SL (p = 0.08). In this group of patients CD68+ macrophage infiltration was significantly reduced in the LL by 59% (p = 0.008) and in the SL by 52% (p = 0.008), which corresponded with the reductions in chemokine expression. In the remaining 10 patients who did not achieve full remission there were no significant changes in the variables studied. In the group achieving ACR 50% or 70% response there was a reduction in CD68 expression that approached significance (p = 0.06 in LL and SL), but there was no significant change in the other variables. There were no significant changes in the patients with an ACR 20% response. In the radiological arrest group (12 patients) there was a 41% reduction in LL expression of MIP-1a (p = 0.05) and MMP-1 (p = 0.06). Reductions in MMP:TIMP expression were also noted, in particular in MMP-1:TIMP-1 expression in the LL (p = 0.04) and MMP-3:TIMP-1 in the SL (p = 0.01). There were corresponding reductions in CD68 expression by 49% (p = 0.009) in LL and by 42% (p = 0.0005) in SL. In the radiological progressors (6 patients) there were no significant reductions in mediator expression. CONCLUSION: In RA, ACR defined remission is associated with reductions in MMP-1 and 3 expression, with a corresponding reduction in macrophage infiltration and a tendency to reduction in MIP-1a expression. Radiological arrest is associated with reductions in MMP-1 expression, and significant reductions in macrophage infiltration, MIP-1 expression, and MMP:TIMP ratio.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".