HIGH-MOUNTAINVEGETATION OF THE SANGILEN PLATEAU
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Сlassification and syntaxonomic analysis of Cobresia high mountain communities, shrub and bush tundra South-Western part of the Sangilen Plateau was performed. Communities with dominance of Kobresia myosuroides were included in the association Kobresio myosuroidis–Pentaphylloidetum fruticosae ass. nova hoc loco (alliance Kobresion myosuroidis Mirkin at al. (1983) 1986, order Kobresietalia myosuroidis Mirkin et al. (1983) 1986), with dominance of Dryas oxyodonta was included in the association Dracocephalo grandiflori – Dryadetum oxyodontae ass. nova hoc loco (allians Dryadion oxyodontae Zhitlukhina et Onishchenko 1987, order Kobresietalia myosuroidis Mirkin et al. (1983) 1986). The shrub tundra of the class Loiseleurio–Vaccinietea Eggler 1952 were represented by two orders (Betuletalia rotundifoliae Mirkin at al. ex Chytrý Pešout et Anenkhonov 1993 and Rhododendro – Vaccinietalia Br.-Bl. ex Daniels 1994). Association Carici tristis – Betuletum rotundifoliae ass. nova hoc loco and a new alliance Carici tristis – Betulion rotundifoliae all. nova hoc loco were described in the Betuletalia rotundifoliae Mirkin at al. ex Chytrý Pešout et Anenkhonov 1993 order. Alliance Carici tristis – Betulion rotundifoliae all. nova hoc loco includes grass-shrub tundra of the semiarid and arid part of the Altai-Sayan mountain system and Northern Mongolia. The alliance Saxifrago oppositifoliae – Rhododendretum adamsii all. nova hoc loco was included in the Rhododendro – Vaccinietalia Br.-Bl. ex Daniels 1994 order. These are shrub tundra dominated by shrubs and bushes calciphilous species (Rhododendron adamsii, Caragana jubata, Salix berberifolia, S. reticulata и др.). Two new associations (Saxifrago oppositifoliae – Rhododendroetum adamsii ass. nova hoc loco and Saussureo schanginianae – Caraganetum jubatae ass. nova hoc loco) of this alliance were described.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".