Aguas subterráneas transfronterizas y fracking: invisibilidad y fragmentación en el contexto de la integración energética de América del Norte
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the energy integration process of North America, the United States is promoting the geographical expansion of fracking to extract shale gas towards Canada and Mexico, taking advantage of the transboundary shale plays. Although transboundary groundwater could be a strategic input for such a process, it is often viewed as a strictly technical matter. This work analyzes from the hydrosocial cycle approach, the data set related to three key components that are indexed in the use of shale gas: transboundary shale play (as hydrocarbon reservoirs), fracking (as an extractive method) and transboundary aquifers (as a water “reservoir”). The findings refer to different levels of knowledge, a fragmented spatial understanding of the fracking phenomenon persists, as a regional and transboundary scalar problem that articulates several knowledge and stakeholders in order to protect and conserve groundwater.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it