MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Energy-Efficient 200 GHz Power Amplifier Design for 5G-IoT Smart-Grid Edge Communication

2025· article· W7139921713 on OpenAlexaff
Ziteng Liu, Zhou Na, Zhengliang Fu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmplifierPower (physics)Enhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionBroadbandBandwidth (computing)Preamplifier

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the rapid development of fifth-generation mobile communication (5G) and the Internet of Things (IoT), the communication demands of smart grids are evolving toward higher frequencies, broader bandwidths, and greater energy efficiency. Future smart grid nodes require not only stable power control but also high-speed, low-latency data interaction in distributed environments. Consequently, radio frequency frontend circuits operating in the millimeter-wave and sub-terahertz (sub THz) frequency bands have emerged as a critical technology. However, existing 200 GHz power amplifiers (PAs) in CMOS and SiGe technologies typically achieve only 10-15 dB gain with PAE below 5%, limiting their use in energy-constrained smartgrid edge nodes. Therefore, a design that combines broadband gain and high energy efficiency under compact integration is required. This paper designs and simulates a broadband power amplifier operating at 200 GHz to support edge communication in 5G and IoT driven smart grids. The amplifier achieves a gain exceeding 20 dB, a 3 dB bandwidth of 40 GHz, and input output matching better than −10 dB. By adopting a dual parallel structure and Wilkinson power combiner, the amplifier delivers approximately 6 dB of power gain, achieving 10 mW output power and over 10% power added efficiency (PAE) under a 2 V supply voltage. Simulation results demonstrate stable performance (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$K&gt;1, \mu&gt;1$</tex>) across the 1 GHz-400 GHz frequency range, validating its potential application in future 5G smart grids and IoT communication nodes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.825
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207