MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ANN-Incorporated Absorbing Boundary Conditions for the Wave-Equation-Based FDTD Method

2025· article· W7139942338 on OpenAlexaff
Qi-Chang Dong, Zhizhang David Chen, Wen Chen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBoundary value problemFinite-difference time-domain methodWork (physics)Boundary (topology)Finite difference method

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method(A. Z. Elsherbeni and V. Demir, The finite-difference time-domain method for electromagnetics with MATLAB simulations. Raleigh, NC: SciTech Pub., 2009.) requires truncating the computational domain to a finite space using absorbing boundary conditions (ABCs) that emulate the unbounded exterior region by absorbing outgoing electromagnetic waves. Among various ABCs, the perfectly matched layer (PML) is widely recognized for its robustness, though it typically requires multiple layers, consuming large computational resources. Recent advancements have integrated artificial neural networks (ANNs) with PML, reducing its thickness to a single layer or boundary line, thereby saving memory and computation time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.388
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical MethodsFrench-language works237,207