MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Context-Aware RESTful API Framework for Real-Time Phishing Risk Mitigation Using Multidimensional Analytical Models

2025· article· W7140088085 on OpenAlexaff
Ashvin J. Ade, Pritish A. Tijare

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpam and Phishing Detection
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhishingRisk managementKey (lock)Dimension (graph theory)Risk assessmentDomain (mathematical analysis)Multidimensional data

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phishing attacks represent a remarkable threat to the digital ecosystem, being especially vicious in fast-changing environments such as e commerce, social media, and online banking. The existing mitigation methods are either rule-based filtering, blacklisting, or feature extraction in isolation and fail to view the evolving contextual and behavioral dynamics of sophisticated phishing techniques. Such conventional models cannot adapt to changing environments, fail to look at sessionaware behavior, and consequently, respond in real time, at best. Thus, this study proposes a new RESTful Phishing Risk Mitigation Framework, a near-real-time, API-based architecture that detects phishing risks using context-aware set of intelligence. The model introduces five novel analytical methods capable of targeting very specific threat dimensions in HTTP-based interactions: Dynamic Meta-Behavioral Fusion (DMBF) calculates a behavioral risk vector by fusing metadata, device fingerprinting, and interaction metrics across sessions. Recursive Embedded Content Diffusion Analysis (RECDA) traces embedded resources recursively to evaluate deep-link phishing behavior using DOM simulations. Context-Aware Referrer Chain Validity (CRCV) examines the consistency of domain transitions and identifies semantic anomalies within referring chains. Temporal Entropy Sequencing Engine (TESE) analyzes time-series entropy of request patterns to detect botdriven or high-drift user behavior sets. Adaptive Client-Side Integrity Signal Aggregator (ACISA) captures passive client side anomalies including CSP violations and blocked script events for real-time integrity signals, increasing the final risk score. The layered framework improves detection accuracy, supports session continuity analysis, and allows for modular packages across various digital platforms. Experiments give an AUC of <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\geq 0.93$</tex> while keeping false-positive rates below 4 %. This framework helps take a giant leap toward proactive phishing defense through behavioral-learning analysis, structural validation, and client-side introspection sets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.682
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpam and Phishing DetectionFrench-language works237,207