Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
[EN] Academic Exchanges. Hazenhogeschool. Groningen (The Netherlands). The purpose of this Final Thesis is the design of the building for the new pumping station and the remodelling of the existing locks to protect them from the environment, making the area a landmark for the north of The Netherlands. Firstly, the project develops the research where the requirements of buildings, materials and the energetic system supplies are set. The project is divided into two parts, on the one hand the locks and on the other hand the pumping station and the experience centre. Both buildings have a similar structure of steel and coated of glass, Canadian wood, aluminium and solar panel. To remodel the three locks, an auxiliary structure is designed to transmit the least stresses to the existing concrete structure. About the construction procedure, due to the climate most of the elements of the building are prefabricated and assembled on site. The foundation of the pumping station is submerged in the lake so it is studied with special attention; a cofferdam is made to carry out the foundation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it