Images of Silence: a creative and artistic approach to communicating the findings of a seismic experiment in northern Chile
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Here we present a dissemination method that combines science and art to visualize a seismic experiment conducted in northern Chile. Through the expertise of an illustrator using digital watercolor techniques and a science journalist who contributed her expertise in creating plain-language keynotes, we created six visually compelling art pieces to summarize the progress and results of the first year of a project funded by Fondecyt-ANID. The artwork, called “Images of Silence” ( Imágenes del Silencio , originally in spanish), plays with the concepts of silence and images . Here, the quitness of the desert is often interrupted by the loudness of seismic activity. Additionally, the illustrations - images to tell a story - offers a narrative for a seismic experiment that aims to image the Earth's interior. This artwork creatively incorporates indigenous pictograms found in regional rock formations, making a meaningful connection between seismology and the region's rich cultural heritage. Finally, Images of the Silence is an transdisciplany work with scientifics, journalists and artists to develop an unconventional approach to better communicate our results and remind us that science and art always go together.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".