MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A CNN-Transformer Hybrid for Precise Object Detection in UAV Aerial Imagery

2025· article· W7140313907 on OpenAlexaff
Abhishake Reddy Onteddu, Rahul Reddy Bandhela, RamMohan Reddy Kundavaram, V.Jagannaveen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObject detectionObject (grammar)Noise (video)Feature (linguistics)Edge detectionDrone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The proposed hybrid framework in this paper is a deep learning technique to robustly detect objects and classify them in real-time applications and includes the use of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to capture local features, Transformer blocks to learn the global context, and adaptive feature fusing gating to integrate information to achieve optimal consistency. The proposed architecture uses feature pyramid networks (FPN) combined with path aggregation networks (PAN) to help provide better multi-scale representation and accelerate large and small, as well as rich and weak objects. Broad experiments have been carried out across several benchmark and cross-domain datasets such as indoor detection, agricultural leaf diseases recognition, and X-ray illegal content identification. This proposed model has an mAP@0.5:0.95 of 55.7 percent, a precision of 91-4 percent, and a recall of 88.0 percent, with a speed of 126 FPS on an RTX 4090, out beating state-of-the-art models like YOLOv7, DETR, and RT-DETR. Superior generalization ability is confirmed by cross-domain evaluations, and complementary role of the modules is validated by ablation studies. These findings show that the suggested framework can accomplish a desirable trade-off of accuracy and speed with good results and may be utilized on real-time tasks, e.g., autonomous navigation, industrial inspection, or security monitoring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207