MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7140417612 · doi:10.1333/s00897172758a

Introducing Supercritical CO2 Extraction Into Undergraduate Laboratories

2017· article· en· W7140417612 on OpenAlexaff
John Thompson, Shad Grunert, Natalia Sannikova, Hamel N. Tailor, Nabyl Merbouh

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Chemical Educator · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicVarious Chemistry Research Topics
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupercritical fluid extractionExtraction (chemistry)Supercritical fluidSupercritical carbon dioxideCarbon dioxide

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The applicability of supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) in an undergraduate laboratory setting is demonstrated in this paper through a series of experiments. Using a commercial supercritical carbon dioxide (SCCO2) apparatus, the extraction of natural products was conducted from small trials to large scale with subsequent separation and purification of compounds of interest. When extraction is coupled with the analytical tools of NMR, GC-FID, and GC-MS, SFE can prove to be a valuable addition to the undergraduate teaching laboratory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Chemical EducatorSame topicVarious Chemistry Research TopicsFrench-language works237,207