MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7140417612 · doi:10.1333/s00897172758a

Introducing Supercritical CO2 Extraction Into Undergraduate Laboratories

2017· article· en· W7140417612 on OpenAlexaff
John Thompson, Shad Grunert, Natalia Sannikova, Hamel N. Tailor, Nabyl Merbouh

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Chemical Educator · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicVarious Chemistry Research Topics
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupercritical fluid extractionExtraction (chemistry)Supercritical fluidSupercritical carbon dioxideCarbon dioxide

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The applicability of supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) in an undergraduate laboratory setting is demonstrated in this paper through a series of experiments. Using a commercial supercritical carbon dioxide (SCCO2) apparatus, the extraction of natural products was conducted from small trials to large scale with subsequent separation and purification of compounds of interest. When extraction is coupled with the analytical tools of NMR, GC-FID, and GC-MS, SFE can prove to be a valuable addition to the undergraduate teaching laboratory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.943

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Chemical EducatorSame topicVarious Chemistry Research TopicsFrench-language works237,207