The Contributions of Solomon F. Acree (1875–1957) and the Centennial Anniversary of the Discovery of the Acree–Curtin–Hammett Principle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper describes the forgotten contributions of Solomon F. Acree to the understanding of the dynamics of kinetic systems that lead to multiple products. His seminal paper published in 1907 precedes those of Curtin, Hammett, Winstein, and Holness by nearly 50 years and is the true origin of the well known Curtin–Hammett principle and the Winstein–Holness equation. Acree’s contribution was for products arising from equilibrating tautomers, whereas, that of Curtin, Hammett, Winstein, and Holness was for products arising from equilibrating conformers. In both cases the same principle applies. Exact solutions to the original kinetic scheme are presented with respect to product ratios at initial and final reaction times, including a new kinetic plasticity index which describes how pliable the kinetic system is to producing one product over the other. A brief biographical sketch of Acree is given including a listing of his contributions to various areas of chemical science.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".