MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7140495925 · doi:10.21966/e0r7-ge27

Nanwakolas LiDAR Surveys - Airborne Coastal Observatory

2025· dataset· W7140495925 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHakai Institute · 2025
Typedataset
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLidarWatershedGeneral partnershipData acquisitionField (mathematics)Data collectionPlan (archaeology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this data acquisition was to collect new LiDAR data in support of the Nanwakolas 50 Watersheds Project. The acquisition plan was guided by three complimentary goals: Acquire data for 10 primary watersheds that have stream temperature data but no corresponding LiDAR data. The new LiDAR will allow the NC50 team to include these areas in stream temperature models that consider solar radiation. Acquire new data in areas where the NC50 team is using field measures of solar radiation (canopy photographs) to validate a LiDAR based model of subcanopy solar radiation. This involves one AOI on Quadra Island and one AOI in the Salmon River watershed on Vancouver Island. The new acquisition reduces the time gap between the LiDAR and field validation datasets (canopy photos). Acquire new data in a sample of the small forested catchments being used by the NC50 team to model stream temperature as a function of subcanopy solar radiation and other factors. The new acquisition reduces the time gap between the LiDAR and stream temperature datasets. The team leading the Nanwakolas 50 Watersheds Project provided the following general description of the project for context: The Nanwakolas 50 Watersheds Project was an innovative Indigenous-led science partnership to monitor and develop tools to address the threats posed by climate change and forest management on salmon habitat in the territories of the Nanwakolas member First Nations. The Nanwakolas 50 Watersheds Project was led by the Nanwakolas Council and five of its member Nations (We Wai Kai, Wei Wai Kum, Tlowitsis, Mamalilikulla and K’ómoks First Nations) in close partnership with the Hakai Institute. Funding for the Nanwakolas 50 Watersheds Project was provided by Fisheries and Oceans Canada and the Province of British Columbia through the BC Salmon Restoration and Innovation Fund. Nanwakolas Council, the Nanwakolas member First Nations, and the Hakai Institute (Tula Foundation) made significant in-kind contributions to the project.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.006
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0080.007
Research integrity0.0040.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.061

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHakai InstituteFrench-language works237,207