MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7140534799 · doi:10.3138/jmbs-27481-bernhardt

Acquisition of the German Rhotic by Children With Typical Versus Protracted Phonological Development

2025· article· en· W7140534799 on OpenAlexaff
Barbara May Bernhardt, Aiming Wu, Joseph Paul Stemberger

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Monolingual and Bilingual Speech · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicLanguage Development and Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermanPhonological developmentPhonologyContext (archaeology)PhoneticsLanguage acquisition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The German rhotic (often [ʁ]), tends to be acquired earlier than other rhotics such as /r/, /ɻ/, /ɹ/, whether because of its relatively wide range of acceptable variants or its less complex articulatory configuration. The current study extends research on acquisition of the German rhotic by describing variant and nonvariant outputs in 48 preschoolers with typical versus protracted phonological development (TD–PPD), with reference to preliminary data from one standard German-speaking adult. Children in both developmental groups produced the range of adult variants, although with lower frequency in younger children and those with PPD, especially in clusters and multisyllabic words. Children with PPD showed a greater range and frequency of nonvariant outputs (deletions, substitutions). Although the lack of population-based data on adult variability precludes detailed child–adult comparisons, the study contributes to research on phonological acquisition in the context of variable input.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.605
Threshold uncertainty score0.331

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Monolingual and Bilingual SpeechSame topicLanguage Development and DisordersFrench-language works237,207