MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7140570847 · doi:10.1333/s00897092202a

A Coumarin Mystery–The Case Of The Missing Methyl Groups

2009· article· en· W7140570847 on OpenAlexaffabout
Laura M. Minea, Andrew P. Dicks

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Chemical Educator · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicVarious Chemistry Research Topics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSalicylaldehydeCoumarinProduct (mathematics)Reaction mechanismWork (physics)Mechanism (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article describes a discovery-oriented undergraduate experiment positioned as a “mystery” in an upper-level mechanistic organic course at the University of Toronto. Students individually undertake a trivial synthetic reaction between an aromatic salicylaldehyde and 2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxane-4,6-dione (Meldrum’s acid), without being informed of the product structure. They work collaboratively during the reaction time to propose both a likely product and operative mechanism given the experimental conditions and physical observations made. Finally, students obtain spectroscopic information about their synthesized compound and justify whether their predictions were sound (or otherwise).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.639

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Chemical EducatorSame topicVarious Chemistry Research TopicsFrench-language works237,207