MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Large-scale Unlabeled Compressed Sensing via Bilinear Matrix Recovery

2025· article· W7140889292 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed Akrout, Amine Mezghani, Faouzi Bellili

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Winnipeg
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMatrix (chemical analysis)Compressed sensingBilinear interpolationPattern recognition (psychology)Compression (physics)Noise (video)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces an algorithmic solution to a broader class of unlabeled sensing problems with multiple measurement vectors (MMV). The goal is to recover an unknown structured signal matrix, X, from its noisy linear observation matrix, Y , whose rows are further randomly shuffled by an unknown permutation matrix U. A new Bayes-optimal unlabeled compressed sensing (UCS) recovery algorithm developed from the bilinear approximate message passing (Bi-VAMP) framework using non-separable and coupled priors on the rows and columns of the permutation matrix U. Standard unlabeled sensing boils down to a special case of the proposed UCS framework, which assumes neither a partially shuffled signal matrix X nor a small-size permutation matrix U. Numerical results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed UCS algorithm and its advantage over state-of-the-art approaches in various applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.824
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSparse and Compressive Sensing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207