MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7141038043 · doi:10.1017/s0007680526101639

Announcements

2025· article· en· W7141038043 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Business History Review · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHuman auditory perception and evaluation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBinghamton UniversityUppsala UniversitetUniversität ZürichUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreRitsumeikan UniversityUniversitetet i OsloManchester Metropolitan UniversityOrta Doğu Teknik ÜniversitesiQueen's UniversityUniversidad Complutense de MadridUniversita degli Studi di Bari Aldo MoroUniversity of New EnglandUniversity of South AustraliaBrandeis UniversityUniversity of WollongongUniversity of Colorado DenverUniversity of New South WalesUniversity of GlasgowKing's College LondonCentral Michigan UniversityUniversité LavalHagley Museum and LibraryHarvard Business SchoolUniversity of WarwickBoise State UniversityUniversité de LausanneUniversidad de NavarraNational University of SingaporeLondon School of Economics and Political ScienceQueen's University BelfastWake Forest University
KeywordsAction (physics)Quality (philosophy)Relation (database)Content (measure theory)Product (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.204
Threshold uncertainty score0.291

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.7960.644

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Business History ReviewSame topicHuman auditory perception and evaluationFrench-language works237,207