MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7141083996 · doi:10.3917/e.eg.413.0223

Connecting, Disconnecting and Reconnecting: Port Logistics and Vancouver's Fraser River

2012· article· W7141083996 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueL’Espace géographique · 2012
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicMaritime Ports and Logistics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPort (circuit theory)Rail transportationConcurrenceRoad transport

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé Cet article à visée historique et descriptive concerne les parties urbaines de la Fraser River. Il a pour objectif de montrer le rôle passé, présent et futur du fleuve dans la logistique de la région métropolitaine de Vancouver. Certains facteurs sont identifiés qui influencent fortement les paramètres du transport fluvial, qu’ils soient liés au marché foncier, à la structure réglementaire, aux infrastructures ou à la mise en valeur du foncier. La volonté de redonner un rôle central en matière de transport aux villes portuaires fluviales et aux voies navigables est confrontée à de nombreux défis, du fait de la concurrence s’exerçant sur l’utilisation du foncier, qui viennent s’ajouter aux défis bien connus pour le transport fluvial, en particulier au niveau de la rentabilité.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.669
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueL’Espace géographiqueSame topicMaritime Ports and LogisticsFrench-language works237,207