MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7141959315 · doi:10.71465/ajpeps2463

Impact of Power Electronics on Power Loss Reduction in Electrical Grids

2020· article· W7141959315 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal Of Power Electronics And Power Systems · 2020
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPower electronicsPower (physics)Power factorElectronicsSwitched-mode power supplyReduction (mathematics)Power semiconductor deviceGridPower transmission

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Power electronics play a crucial role in enhancing the efficiency of electrical grids by reducing power losses. This paper explores the impact of power electronic devices on the minimization of energy losses in both transmission and distribution networks. The study highlights various power electronics applications, including high-efficiency inverters, voltage-source converters, and power factor correction devices. We investigate their role in minimizing resistive losses, improving voltage regulation, and enabling advanced control strategies for grid stability. The article also examines case studies demonstrating the effectiveness of power electronics in real-world grid applications

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.470
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal Of Power Electronics And Power SystemsSame topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207