MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7142137892 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.19289819

Sobre as imagens de uma casa: a residência de Hans Broos no Morumbi

2020· article· pt· W7142137892 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ana Emília Formiga Marques, Fernando Guillermo Vázquez Ramos

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldEngineering
TopicArchitecture, Modernity, and Design
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisionWork (physics)Quarter (Canadian coin)Order (exchange)Judgement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resumo: A visão de um artista sobre sua própria obra é importante não porque revele a essência ou a verdade da obra, mas porque ilumina um lado dessas questões, o do criador, normalmente pleno de intenções e de expectativas que não se verificam em outras visões (usuários, historiadores, críticos etc.) sobre a mesma obra. Nesta comunicação analisamos algumas das questões que levaram a um artista, o arquiteto Hans Broos, a pensar longamente sobre sua residência, projetada e construída nos anos de 1970 (1971-1978), no bairro Fazenda Morumbi, em São Paulo. Uma casa retratada em inúmeras fotografias e desenhos que, durante anos (desde o preparo do terreno para a construção), lhe interessou desenvolver. Uma prova, talvez, de um entendimento vívido do projeto, como obra inacabada, sempre em constante alteração, com um significado em aberto. Abstract: An artist's view of his own work is important not because it reveals the essence or the truth of the work, but because it illuminates one side of these issues, that of the creator, which is usually full of intentions and expectations that cannot be seen in other visions on the same work (users, historians, critics, etc.). In this paper we analyse some of the questions that led an artist, the architect Hans Broos, to think at length about his residence, designed and built in the 1970s (1971-1978) at Fazenda Morumbi neighborhood, in São Paulo. A house portrayed in countless photographs and drawings that for years (since preparing the land for construction) he was interested in developing. A proof, perhaps, of a vivid understanding of the project as an unfinished work, always in constant change with an open meaning. Resumen: La visión de un artista sobre su propia obra es importante no porque revele la esencia o la verdad de la obra, sino porque ilumina uno de los lados del tema, el del creador, que suele estar lleno de intenciones y expectativas que no se pueden ver en otras visiones sobre una misma obra (las de usuarios, historiadores, críticos, etc.). En esta comunicación analizamos algunas de las cuestiones que llevaron a un artista, el arquitecto Hans Broos, a reflexionar sobre su residencia, diseñada y construida en la década de 1970 (1971-1978), en el barrio Fazenda Morumbi, de Sao Paulo. Una casa retratada en innumerables fotografías y dibujos que, durante años (desde que preparó el terreno para la construcción), se interesó en cultivar. Prueba, quizás, de una comprensión viva del proyecto, como obra inacabada, siempre en constante cambio, con un sentido abierto.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0180.012
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicArchitecture, Modernity, and DesignFrench-language works237,207