Strategies for Facing Quarter Life Crisis: The Combination of Religiosity and Peer Pressure in Fresh Graduates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The quarter-life crisis is a feeling of anxiety that arises from the uncertainty of life ahead, particularly in relation to relationships, career, and social life, typically occurring in one's 20s. The challenges faced during a quarter-life crisis include issues related to dreams and expectations, academic interests, religion and spirituality, as well as work and career life. These problems emerge when individuals reach the age of 18-29, or after completing their secondary education, such as university students. The academic leap from university to the workforce often causes emotional wounds and instability, leading to an emotional crisis. This study is quantitative and focuses on fresh graduates who graduated during periods 3, 4, and 5 of 2023 at UIN Raden Intan Lampung, who are not yet employed. It uses random sampling to select 249 fresh graduates as respondents. The measurement tools used include scales for quarter-life crisis, religiosity, and peer pressure. Multiple regression analysis was applied to analyze the data, using SPSS 26 for Windows. The analysis revealed a significant relationship between religiosity and peer pressure with the quarter-life crisis, with an R value of 0.348 and an F value of 6.390. The effective contribution was found to be 12.1%. The study also discovered a positive relationship between religiosity and quarter-life crisis in fresh graduates, contributing 10.58%. Furthermore, the study found a negative relationship between peer pressure and quarter-life crisis in fresh graduates, with an effective contribution of 1.50%. Keywords: religiosity, peer pressure, quarter life crisis
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".