MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7142568124

Assessing welfare in developing countries before, during, and after Covid-19 using actual household data:he case of Mozambique

2024· report· en· W7142568124 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Vincenzo Salvucci, Finn Tarp

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) · 2024
Typereport
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWelfarePovertyConsumption (sociology)Developing countryQuarter (Canadian coin)PandemicSurvey data collectionRural area
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study we utilise data from two household budget surveys conducted in Mozambique in 2019/20 and in 2022. Our aim is to assess the differentiated impact of Covid-19 on household welfare in this period. To establish a baseline, we use data from the first quarter of the 2019/20 survey, which was unaffected by the pandemic. Considering the varying exposure to Covid-19, we also investigate the distinct dynamics that unfolded across different regions and areas within the country. Employing an inverse probability weighted regression adjustment approach, we compare welfare metrics during different pandemic phases. Our findings reveal that, at national level, consumption levels and poverty rates worsened during the Covid-19 pandemic compared to the pre-Covid-19 period, partially recovering at the end of the pandemic. However, the national dynamics hide strongly diverging trends between, on the one hand, rural areas and the northern region, where consumption and poverty improved in 2022, even with respect to pre-Covid-19, and, on the other hand, urban areas and the southern region, where consumption and poverty were strongly affected during the initial phases of the pandemic but did not recover by 2022, instead worsening after the final and most challenging stages of Covid-19. Remarkably, Mozambique stands out as possibly the only developing country in sub-Saharan Africa with genuine, in-person survey data spanning the entire duration of the pandemic, including the pre- and post-pandemic phases. Our analysis contributes valuable insights into the short- and medium-term welfare implications of Covid-19 in a low-income context. Given the government’s limited fiscal capacity to mitigate pandemic-related negative effects and the country’s underdeveloped social protection policies, we emphasise the critical need for Mozambique to create stronger response mechanisms to temporary and geographically diversified shocks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.344
Threshold uncertainty score0.684

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.183
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)→French-language works237,207→