MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7142981496 · doi:10.4103/pjhrd_2023271_61

Why Are Children Highly Vulnerable to Dengue Infection?

2023· article· en· W7142981496 on OpenAlexaff
Benie T. Constantino

Bibliographic record

VenuePhilippine Journal of Health Research and Development · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMosquito-borne diseases and control
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDengue feverOutbreakDengue virusPublic healthVulnerability (computing)Dengue vaccine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The prevalence of dengue infection poses a great public health concern among people living in tropical and subtropical countries like the Philippines. Just recently in 2019, the Philippines had a dengue virus (DENV) outbreak where nearly half of the mortalities were children between 5 and 9 years of age, and around 73% of confirmed DENV cases were under the age of 19. Children are disproportionately affected and are considered to be highly vulnerable to severe dengue infection compared to adults due to several factors. These include: immunological differences--poorly developed immune systems, making them more susceptible to the virus; smaller body sizes and weight means that they are more likely to experience severe symptoms; and their tendency to play outdoors, make them more exposed to mosquito bites. Hence, this article provides an overview of the current understanding for the vulnerability of children to severe dengue infection compared to adults.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.126
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhilippine Journal of Health Research and Development→Same topicMosquito-borne diseases and control→French-language works237,207→