Ostrinia nubilalis Hübner 1796
Bibliographic record
Abstract
409. Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner, [1796] 1796–1833c: 25, pl. 14 fig. 94) (Pyralis) Type locality: Germany. Hungary = Pyralis silacealis Hübner, [1796] 1796 –1833c: 25, pl. 18 fig. 116 Type locality: Austria = Pyralis glabralis Haworth, 1811: 380 Type locality: Great Britain = Botys appositalis Lederer, 1858: 148 Type locality: Syria, Damaskus = Botis nubilalis var. paulalis Fuchs, 1900: 71 Type locality: Germany, St. Goarshausen = Pyrausta funeralis Zerny, 1914: 333 Type locality: Kirgizstan, Ferghana, Usgent = Pyrausta nubilalis f. fanalis Costantini, 1923: 105 Type locality: Italy = Pyrausta nubilalis ab. insignis Skala, 1928: 106 Type locality: Czech Republic, Moravia, Nikolsburg = Pyrausta nubilalis ab. margarita Skala, 1928: 106 Type locality: Czech Republic, Moravia, Nikolsburg = Pyrausta nubilis [sic] rubescens Krulikovsky, 1928: 212 = Pyrausta nubilalis ab. flava Dufrane, 1930: 71 Type locality: Belgium, Marcinelle = Pyrausta nubilalis ab. minor Dufrane, 1930: 71 Type locality: Belgium = Pyrausta nubilalis ab. fuscalis Romaniszyn, 1933: 84 Type locality: Poland, Strzattków = Ostrinia nubilalis mauretanica Mutuura & Munroe, 1970: 40, figs 155–160, 297, 509–526 Type locality: Algeria, prov. Oran, Sebdou = Ostrinia nubilalis persica Mutuura & Munroe, 1970: 41, figs 165–166, 537–538 Type locality: North Iran, Astrabad Distribution. Indian records: N. W. Himalayas, Sikkim, Manipur (Hampson 1896b), Sikkim, Naga Hills (Snellen 1890), Himalayas, Assam (Caradja 1925), Manipur, Meghalaya (Joshi et al. 2021). Global records: Europe (Hampson 1896b), Europa, As. min., Siberien, Japan, China (Caradja 1925), Vietnam (Tonkin) (de Joannis 1930), Morocco (Amsel 1956b), Iran (Amsel 1959a), Georgia (Amsel 1959b), Algeria, Morocco, Spain, Portugal, France, Italy, Germany, Austria, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Yugoslavia, Romania, Turkey, Iran, USSR, Canada (Ontario, Newfoundland, Quebec, Manitoba), USA (Pennsylvania, Vermont, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Michigan, Tennessee, New York, Missouri, Indiana, Mississippi, Virginia) (Mutuura & Munroe 1970), Cyprus (Arenberger 1994), America North of Mexico (Scholtens & Solis 2015).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".