MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7143519552 · doi:10.22176/act24.6.1

Critical Reflections on the Scholarly Work of Thomas A. Regelski

2025· article· W7143519552 on OpenAlexaff
Vincent C. Bates, Deborah Bradley, J. Scott Goble

Bibliographic record

VenueAction Criticism and Theory for Music Education · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDiverse Music Education Insights
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPragmatismField (mathematics)Work (physics)ScholarshipEditorial board

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thomas A. Regelski, who created this journal—Action, Criticism, and Theory for Music Education—and co-founded the MayDay Group, died one year ago. We are pleased to present this special issue of ACT in his memory. All three guest editors previously served as editors for this journal and worked closely with Tom in this and other capacities. We each have an abiding respect for his contributions to the academic field of school music education. In this editorial, we highlight the ongoing importance of Tom’s writing and organizing. We also consider relevant reinterpretations, extensions, and applications of his academic output, including concepts associated with Critical Theory, aesthetic experience, neoliberalism, anti-racism, pragmatist philosophy, ethnomusicology, and musicology. Finally, we introduce and contextualize the other four articles within this issue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.050
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.097

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.050
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0170.030
Scholarly communication0.0180.010
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0090.028
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.135
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAction Criticism and Theory for Music EducationSame topicDiverse Music Education InsightsFrench-language works237,207