MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7143604049 · doi:10.71465/ajainn634

The Role of Deep Learning in Augmented Reality Applications

2024· article· W7143604049 on OpenAlexaff
Dr. Olivia Turner, Lucas M. Harrison

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Neural Networks · 2024
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicAugmented Reality Applications
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeep learningAugmented realityObject (grammar)Key (lock)Natural (archaeology)Visualization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Augmented Reality (AR) has gained significant attention in recent years due to its ability to blend digital content with the real world in real-time. Deep learning has played a key role in advancing AR applications by providing more accurate object recognition, scene understanding, and real-time data processing. This article explores the role of deep learning in AR, focusing on its applications in real-time object tracking, facial recognition, spatial mapping, and natural language processing. We also examine how deep learning enables improved user experiences and performance in various AR fields, including gaming, healthcare, education, and manufacturing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.770

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Neural NetworksSame topicAugmented Reality ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207