Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research material introduction is a report based on implementation of the original investigation about the tray table writing in ink unearthed from Yanaginogosyo court remains of the world's cultural and natural heritage "Hiraizumi" related legacy. A drawing tray table where the degree of 1990 was found in research excavation the 28th was estimated by an annual ring dating way at +x year in 1158. Comment with the third quarter in the 12th century is strong by comparative identification the age based on the annual style volume of the pottery. Oshu Fujiwara is the valuable character historical sources all one of the bases which regard 3 generations of Yanaginogosyo court remains as Hiraizumi house in case of Hidehira's active period will be. It was possible to find new fact investigating and analyzing field historical sources actually once more about the tray table writing in ink which are such valuable unearthing relics, and correcting the former way to read, and as a result of further considering the contents of writing in ink. So the order which will be reported with a private view here. Or the title made "the people salary silk diary" in the past was revised with "the bestowal salary silk diary", and it was stated while aiming at placing on the status of Hidehira's legitimete son and Yasuhira about the formation longitude and latitude of this diary, its meaning and the ceremonious signification of the attire bestowed in particular. Further, the class "cultural asset outline" and "paleography outline" "paleography itemized discussion" of which a writer takes charge in the science "paleography training" are the special subject concerned with unit taking for curator qualification acquisition. This report is the material introduction which reread tray table writing in ink of Yanaginogosyo court remains unearting, but when telling the importance of the cultural asset and the ancient document, I think it should be referred to as an outcome of action-training-research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.036 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".