MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7143697583 · doi:10.71465/ajbt2489

Biotechnology for the Development of Smart Agricultural Practices

2023· article· W7143697583 on OpenAlexaff
Dr. Maria Sanchez, Dr. David Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Biotechnology · 2023
Typearticle
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Canadian institutionsBiotechnology Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgricultureAgricultural biotechnologyFood securityEnvironmental biotechnologyGenetic engineeringAgricultural productivity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biotechnology plays a crucial role in transforming agricultural practices to meet the growing demand for food and enhance sustainability. Recent advancements in biotechnology, including genetic engineering, CRISPR technology, and plant-based bioinformatics, are revolutionizing agricultural practices. This article reviews the applications of biotechnology in the development of smart agriculture, focusing on improving crop yield, pest resistance, and environmental sustainability. It also highlights the challenges and future directions in the integration of biotechnology into modern farming practices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.341
Threshold uncertainty score0.883

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of BiotechnologySame topicCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringFrench-language works237,207