MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7143717347 · doi:10.15084/0002000506

国立国語研究所要覧 2025/2026

2025· other· ja· W7143717347 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · 2025
Typeother
Languageja
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute for Basic BiologyResearch Institute for Humanity and NatureJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceNational Institute for Physiological SciencesNational Institute of Polar ResearchInstitute of GeneticsNational Institute for Fusion ScienceInstitute of Space and Astronautical ScienceNational Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics
Keywordsnot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Mission of NINJAL 国立国語研究所は日本語に関係する学術研究の進展を牽引することをミッションとします。 そのために以下の取り組みを重点的に進めます。The mission of the National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics (NINJAL) is to advance academic research related to the Japanese language.NINJAL will achieve this by prioritizing the following initiatives:-言語研究のための高品質な言語資源の開発など,日本語・日本語教育研究のインフラ整備 を大規模かつ組織的に推進し,利用を促進します。 -Promoting the systematic development and widespread use of infrastructure for research on the Japanese language and its education, including large-scale and high-quality language resources.-日本語ならびに日本語と関連する諸言語について,諸科学と連携しながら先端的な研究を 実施して新たな研究領域を開拓し,国内外の研究ネットワークを構築します。 -Conducting cutting-edge research on Japanese and related languages in collaboration with related sciences, pioneering new fields of research, and building both domestic and international research networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.600
Threshold uncertainty score0.571

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0130.007
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6000.730

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)French-language works237,207