Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Irish Affairs was one of the political subjects with which Edmund Burke (1729-97) got deeply involved as a member of the House of Commons. In this paper I will examine his famous Tracts relating to Popery Laws, analyze his assertion in line with the contest, and then discuss its significance. The Tracts was not only his first political pamphlet but also the first of his vindication of the Irish Catholics and Ireland. In addition, it provided even the basis for his later arguments regarding Irish problems. The latter is especially the major premise of this paper. In the Tracts, Burke criticized the popery laws directed against the Irish Catholics from three aspects: The first was that the popery laws were not legally valid. Second, they compelled the Irish Catholics to convert to a specified religion (the Church of Ireland) unjustly. Finally they debilitated Ireland and Great Britain as well. Surveying the points at issue carefully, one notices that Burke had attached great importance to the various disabilities intended to exclude Catholics from property, especially landed propety, and can conclude that he had considered the popery laws to be injurious to the British Constitution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".