MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7143771036 · doi:10.71465/ajml3023

Machine Learning in Healthcare: Forecasting Patient Outcomes with Predictive Models

2022· article· W7143771036 on OpenAlexaff
Dr. Olivia Bennett

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Machine Learning · 2022
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicMachine Learning in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKey (lock)Predictive modellingHealth carePrecision medicinePredictive analyticsPatient care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Machine learning (ML) is rapidly transforming the healthcare landscape by offering powerful tools for predicting patient outcomes. From hospital readmissions to disease progression and survival rates, ML algorithms can utilize vast and complex datasets to uncover patterns and forecast future events. This paper discusses the application of various ML models in forecasting patient outcomes, evaluates their predictive accuracy, and highlights key challenges and future opportunities. The study aims to demonstrate how ML contributes to precision medicine and enhanced clinical decision-making.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.481
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.017
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Machine LearningSame topicMachine Learning in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207