MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7143804418 · doi:10.50818/00000003

血液透析中のソシオエステティックの効果 客観的視点による評価

2020· article· ja· W7143804418 on OpenAlexaff
Richiko FUKUMORI, Yumiko MATSUOKA, Hiroko SAKAMOTO, Manabu KIYOOKA, Hiroe MISTUE, Naoshi FURUKAWA, Yuriko Otsubo, Shigeru Otsubo, Kenichi KUME

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageja
FieldPsychology
TopicMusic Therapy and Health
Canadian institutionsCanadian Association of Occupational Therapists
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProcess (computing)Identification (biology)Product (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

血液透析患者は透析中、拘束感や不安や緊張を伴うことがある。ソシオエステティックとは、人道的・福祉的観点から精神的・肉体的・社会的な困難を抱えている人に対し、医療や福祉の知識に基づいて行う総合的なエステティックである。今回、透析中にソシオエステを施術し、リラックスして透析が受けられるかを検討した。対象は外来維持透析患者6例。透析中、ソシオエステを30分間施行。施術前後の血圧と脈拍数、唾液アミラーゼ活性値を測定した。血圧は施術前後で有意差を認めなかった。脈拍は施術前74±14beat/minより施術後70±13beat/minと有意に低下した(p=0.02)。施術前後の唾液アミラーゼ値は有意な変化を示さなかった。しかし、施術前60KU/Lであった2例は施術後10KU/L以下に低下しており、施術後は1例を除いて全例30KU/L以下であった。血液透析中に安全かつ効果的にソシオエステティックの施術ができた。(著者抄録)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.694
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)Same topicMusic Therapy and HealthFrench-language works237,207