MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7143837500 · doi:10.71465/ajainn615

The Future of Neural Networks in Human-Robot Interaction

2023· article· W7143837500 on OpenAlex
Dr. Daniel Foster, Dr. Amelia Wright

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Neural Networks · 2023
Typearticle
Language
FieldPsychology
TopicSocial Robot Interaction and HRI
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial neural networkField (mathematics)RobotDeep learningHuman–robot interactionDeep neural networks

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human-robot interaction (HRI) is a rapidly advancing field with neural networks playing a central role in making robots more capable of understanding and responding to human behavior. By leveraging deep learning algorithms, robots can now recognize and interpret human emotions, gestures, and speech with increasing accuracy. This article explores the future potential of neural networks in HRI, focusing on how these technologies will enhance robots' social intelligence, adaptability, and real-time decision-making. We also discuss the challenges of implementing neural networks in real-world HRI applications and consider the ethical and societal implications of increasingly autonomous robots.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.726
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it