MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7143973027 · doi:10.71465/ajainn621

AI in Logistics: Neural Networks for Optimized Supply Chain Management

2023· article· W7143973027 on OpenAlexaff
Dr. Michael Roberts, Dr. Sarah Mitchell

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Neural Networks · 2023
Typearticle
Language
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSupply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupply chainArtificial neural networkSupply chain managementService managementSupply chain risk managementDemand forecasting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The logistics and supply chain industry is undergoing a transformation with the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning technologies. Neural networks, a subfield of AI, are playing a crucial role in optimizing supply chain management by providing accurate demand forecasting, inventory management, route optimization, and real-time decision-making. This article explores the applications of neural networks in logistics, focusing on their ability to enhance operational efficiency, reduce costs, and improve customer satisfaction. By leveraging neural networks, logistics companies can develop smarter, more adaptive supply chains that respond to dynamic market conditions and consumer needs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.827
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Neural NetworksSame topicSupply Chain Resilience and Risk ManagementFrench-language works237,207