MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7144115909 · doi:10.24568/6132

東北日本新第三系泥質岩中でのメチルジベンゾチオフェン異性体変化

2003· article· ja· W7144115909 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
良和 三瓶, 徳行 鈴木, 哲也 塩見

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageja
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaturity (psychological)Vitrinite reflectanceVitriniteDiagenesisSubsidenceStage (stratigraphy)Neogene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Isomerizations of methyldibenzothiophene from Neogene mudstones in northeast Japan were examined as a maturity parameter of organic matter during the diagenesis to catagenesis stage.The relationship between methyldibenzothiophene(MDBT)ratio(MDR:4-MDBT/1-MDBT)and vitrinite reflectance(Ro)from the Tojo TS-1 well,which underwent subsidence at low heating rate,can be described by the equation:MDR=15.1 Ro-5.35(n=11,r=0.85,Ro=0.4-0.7%).This equation is similar to that from Elmworth 6-28-68-13 W 6 M in Western Canada.New combination of the 1-MDBT,(2- + 3-)MDBT and 4-MDBT isoomers are used to be a new maturity parameter which is useful in the high maturity stage,up to 3% Ro.The ratio(2- + 3-)MDBT to(1- + 2- + 3- + 4-)MDBT increases from 0.2 to 0.6 over the range 0.4-3.0% Ro.The ratio(2- + 3-)MDBT to 4-MDBT was constant at about 0.5 in the range 0.4-1.5% Ro,and then increases from 0.5 to 4.5 in the range 1.5-2.9% Ro.Therefore,the(2- + 3-)/(1- + 2- + 3- + 4-)MDBT ratio is possibly on effective maturity indicator through the oil generation stage to higher maturity stages such as the dry gas zone.After the catagenesis stage,(2- + 3-)/(4-)MDBT ratio and high Ro gradients could assist interpretation of scattered(2- + 3-)/(1- + 2- + 3- + 4-)MDBT ratios with low gradient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.904
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)Same topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207