MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7144203479 · doi:10.15083/00072982

Studies of the energy, azimuthal, and time spectra of the atmospheric neutrino flux at the Super-Kamiokande detector

2015· dissertation· en· W7144203479 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Euan Neil Richard

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeKerman Neuroscience Research Center, Kerman University of Medical SciencesNational Research FoundationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaU.S. Department of EnergyEuropean CommissionWestern Canada Research GridNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Science FoundationCompute CanadaNational Research Foundation of Korea
KeywordsSpectral lineFlux (metallurgy)DetectorNeutrino detectorNeutrino

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

introduction 1 1 neutrino physics 3 1.1 Motivation: The Atmospheric Neutrino 3 1.2Detection of the Neutrino 5 1.2.1 Theoretical basis 5 1.2.2Experimental history 7 1.3 Neutrino Oscillation 8 1.3.1The lepton mixing matrix 8 1.3.2Oscillation 10 1.3.3Matter effects 11 1.3.4Current experimental status 14 1.4 Massive neutrinos 15 1.4.1 Mass terms 15 1.4.2The seesaw mechanism 17 2 the atmospheric neutrino flux 19 2.1 Origin 19 2.2 Atmospheric Neutrino Flux Simulations 20 2.2.1 Historical approach 20 2.2.2 Rigidity cutoff 21 2.3 The HKKM Flux Model 23 2.3.1 Current model 23 2.3.2Three-dimensional calculation 23 2.3.3Systematic error estimations 25

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)Same topicAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207