Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study focused on the adaptation processes of Japanese women who have immigrated to Canada. I interviewed 11 Japanese women, who ranged in age from their 30s to 50s, who have Permanent Residence （PR） in Canada. I asked them questions regarding their immigration background, the people who helped them, the language classes for immigrants funded by the Canadian government, and their attitudes toward their community. I found that during their initial stay, most of them built functional support networks, which helped them when they returned to Canada in order to start their new life as immigrants. Moreover, a Canadian husband’s support was not sufficient for a Japanese wife’s adaptation. They tended to feel a lack of social connections when starting their new lives. Farther, they did not utilize language programs for newcomers very much; however, the one who did take part in an English language program evaluated it very highly. Finally, most of the participants reported there was no active community in their residential area, like there had been in Japan. They received community news from emails, flyers, and notices at their condominiums.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".