MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7144312755 · doi:10.15113/00014508

The Actual Condition of the Teacher Training System based on the Viewpoint of OJT and OffJT : A comparison between Ontario,Canada and Japan

2018· article· ja· W7144312755 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
久米男 鈴木

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageja
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychological Treatments and Assessments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTraining (meteorology)On-the-job trainingTraining systemVocational education

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

本研究の目的は、教員の研修がより実効性があり、さらに主体的な取り組みとなるための研修システムの在り方を検討することである。そのための手立ての一つとして、OffJT とOJT や自己研修の取り組みを関連づけることがあげられる。このことを踏まえ、我が国の取り組みと諸外国の先進事例としてカナダ・オンタリオ州の教員研修におけるOffJT とOJT や自己研修との関係を明らかにする。 本研究の成果として、我が国におけるOJT とOffJT との関連づけの実態を明らかにすることができた。さらに、オンタリオ州の教員研修の取り組みを踏まえ、我が国の教員研修に対する動機付け向上のための手立の一つとして、OffJT にOJT や自己研修の成果を関連づけるための手立てを検討する。しかし、本研究で明らかにできた内容は、教員の研修への動機付けの一例に過ぎない。今後、教員研修に対する意欲を高めるような具体的な手立てを検討する。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.180
Threshold uncertainty score0.983

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)Same topicPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsFrench-language works237,207