MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7144394601

アングリカニズムの現代的展開 : 英国教会の都市問題との取り組みとそのダイナミックス

2003· article· ja· W7144394601 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageja
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious Freedom and Discrimination
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGospelExpression (computer science)EcclesiologyGeneral partnershipDiversity (politics)GlobalizationMovement (music)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The phrase, "Unity in Diversity" had seemed to be a sound expression of the features of the Anglican Communion for a long time. However, within the passed twenty years or so, the limit of diversity became to be suggested by some Anglicans. One of the main reasons for that might be found in the ironic dynamics of the globalization which sprits this world into pieces and assimilates it as well. Unity in diversity has been regarded as the dynamic expression of the Church as koinonia, Communion. That relates deeply with the expression of One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church that presupposes the mission work of local churches. The catholicity of the Church cannot be visible without local churches that have proclaimed the Gospel and tried to transform their societies through it. In the Church of England, such movements as the Oxford movement, the old Evangelical movement and the Anglo-Catholic Socialist movement have carried the service to the urban poor as a form of the Church Apostolic since the 18th Century. For them, it is the matter of course that without the actions of local churches in their societies there is no unity and partnership among the churches in the Anglican Communion. The fellowship of the churches without mission involvement is just a simple charitable relationship based on giving and receiving that is a relic of mission imperialism. Although this understanding seemed to be shared among a small number of people, it turned out to be different when the Archbsihop of Canterbury's Commission on Urban Priority Areas completed a three-year survey in 1985. Many church people in deprived areas requested that the Church of England transform itself to be much more involved in its social reality. As the first step of the transformation, the Commission called on every diocese and local parish church to have a Mission Audit. Almost simultaneously, the (Anglican) Mission Issues and Strategies Advisory Group called on every Province of the Anglican Communion to realize the idea of Mutual Responsibility and Interdependence and Partnership in Mission, both derived from the Anglican Congress, met at Toronto in 1963. Nippon Sei Ko Kai is also invited to be involved in Mission Audit. This Audit calls us to be attentive to the voice of the deprived. If we are attentive to these voices in our society, we should also be sensitive to the voices of the most deprived in the world. We will then be united with sisters and brothers as partners beyond various boundaries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.945
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it