MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7144462619

P26 高分子鎖絡み合い状態の流動効果のシミュレーションによる解析(基研研究会「ソフトマターの物理学」,研究会報告)

2002· article· ja· W7144462619 on OpenAlexaff
Akiyoshi Kuroda, Kiyohito Koyama

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageja
FieldEngineering
TopicMilitary Technology and Strategies
Canadian institutionsVancouver Biotech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSet (abstract data type)Perspective (graphical)Product (mathematics)Identification (biology)Relation (database)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

現在、紡糸業界などでは高強度繊維化による極細繊維、機械業界では耐摩耗性に優れるシール剤など、産業界からプラスチック材料の高強炭化に対する要望が高い。以上の高強度材料開発には、化学的手法の他に高結晶化/モルフォロジー制御という物理的手法も必要不可欠であり、様々な方法が考えられている。本研究では、低コストで高結晶化実現を目指すべく生成初期の溶融状態での流れのコントロールを行うことで、この絡み合い状態の制御の可能性を模索する。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.877
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)Same topicMilitary Technology and StrategiesFrench-language works237,207