MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7144642096

森林と境界をもつ草原内にベイトトラップを配置する場合の緩衝帯および草原内の河畔林の有用性:インドネシア共和国東カリマンタン州の食糞性コガネムシ類群集についての予備的研究

2015· article· en· W7144642096 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Akira UEDA, Woro A. Noerdjito, Dhian Dwibadra, Sugiarto, Masahiro Kon, Teruo Ochi, Masayoshi TAKAHASHI, Tetsuya Igarashi, Kenji Fukuyama

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMilitary Technology and Strategies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceCanadian Forest ServiceLembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan IndonesiaU.S. Forest ServiceForestry and Forest Products Research Institute
KeywordsProcess (computing)Identification (biology)Product (mathematics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dung beetles (Coprophagous group of Scarabaeoidea: Bolboceratidae and parts of Scarabaeidae (Scarabaeinae and Aphodiinae) in the present study) represent an important indicator of habitat quality and environmental

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.853
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)Same topicMilitary Technology and StrategiesFrench-language works237,207