Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper examines the long-term transition of regional administration and regional planning efforts centered on the British Columbia government and the regional government of the Vancouver metropolitan area, which was highly evaluated as the most livable city in the world in the early 21st century. Three unique points that have had a major impact to this day were found. The first is the turning point of the realization of the livable city as an urban development orientation that is characteristic of Vancouver, and the continuous efforts to realize a desirable urban image shared by many residents, from the policies that prioritized efficiency and industrial growth up to that point. The second is the importance of the work of the regional districts, a regional government system unique to BC, which is the main actor in realizing this. The third is the ability to flexibly review and respond to serious issues caused by the backlash of the growth management policy used as a method of spatial development. As a result, despite being located on the North American continent, a compact urban area with high living convenience was formed, and a sustainable and livable metropolitan area was realized in response to the challenges associated with the progress of motorization and population growth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".