MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7145403735

Information systems of banking application in Edmonton Canada

2008· article· ja· W7145403735 on OpenAlex
サトル クワハラ, Satoru Kuwahara

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageja
FieldComputer Science
TopicInformation Systems Education and Curriculum Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInformation systemService (business)Information and Communications TechnologyExtension (predicate logic)Information technology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

2007年9月から,6ヶ月の予定で,教員海外研修として,アルバータ大学エクステンション学部において現地の情報システム関連のフィールド調査を行っている.ここでは,アルバータ州エドモントン市における一般消費者に直接関係する情報システムの例として,銀行の預け払いシステムについての調査研究を行い,そこから,ヒューマンインタフェースを含む情報システムに対する一般消費者の考え方の一旦を明らかにした.In the period of my oversea study and research program or six months from September, 2007 I have been in Faculty of Extension University of Alberta. Here, I have studied and researched ICT(Information and Communication Technology) and venture businesses in ICT field. In this paper, as one of the result, I described the actual situation about information system of banks for personal consumers in Canada and the difference of recognitions of society between Japan and Canada which shapes the difference of service level in this field. I would like to express my special thanks to Faculty of Extension University of Alberta for their support.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.828
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.005
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it