Bibliographic record
Abstract
[要約]本論文では，第１章において，イギリスとフランス，オランダ，ドイツ，イタリア等の大陸ヨーロッパ諸国との関係を概観する。第２章では，ブレクジットを起こした原因を検討する。第３章では，ブレクジットに対する影響を最小限とするためにイギリスが，諸外国との貿易取引をいかに高めるかについて検討する。つまり，イギリスの通商政策である，EUとの FTA，日本との EPA，アメリカ，カナダ，オーストラリアやニュージーランド等の旧大英帝国諸国との FTA さらには TTP への参加について検討する。第４章では，日本の通商外交政策のかなめであり，EU，アメリカとの通商交渉においても非常に重要と考えられているデジタル取引のルールについて，最新の日英 EPA における政策を検討する。第５章では，イギリスがブレクジットによる損失を補填するために早急に必要とされる諸外国との通商交渉について検討する。 [Abstract] In this paper, Part 1 gives a general overview of the UK's relationship with France, the Netherlands, Germany, Italy and other countries in Continental Europe. Part 2 considers the causes of Brexit. Part ３ considers how much the UK will need to increase trade with foreign nations to minimize the effect of Brexit. In other words, it will consider the FTA it has with the EU, the EPA it has with Japan, the FTA it has with the USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and other member countries of the former British Empire, and additionally the UK entry into the TTP. Part 4 considers the policies in the latest Japan-UK EPA regarding electronic commerce, a corner stone of Japan’s foreign trade policy, and also thought during trade negotiations with the EU and the USA as well to be extremely important. Part 5 considers the trade negotiations that the UK needs to undertake immediately to compensate for its losses due to Brexit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".