MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7145588297

On the Sixth Article of the Jishukan School Regulations(In Commemoration of the Retirement of Professor Shunsuke Okuda, Michinobu Takagi and Tadashi Takahashi)

2004· article· ja· W7145588297 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
全安 朱, Zenan Shu

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageja
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Robotics and Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSixth centuryQuarter (Canadian coin)Sixth form
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

江戸時代中期の宝暦五年(一七五五年),熊本藩に創設された藩校時習館の初代教授秋山玉山が撰した「時習館学規」中,漢籍の読み方を規定した第六条「害須背誦誦須華音否則四声不明同訓相混宇位或易語助或脱不足以供文辞之用和読之陋也故害必背誦誦必華音而後斎楚合焉彼此一焉是処之荘嶽之間之術也立漢語之師」を取り上げ,これにより,長い間伝統的な漢文訓読法による漢文教育が行われてきた中で,中国語音に基づく漢文直読法による漢文教育が,学校教育の中に取り入れられたことを論じた。漢籍の読解方法について,中国語で書かれた漢籍を日本語として読むゆえに弊害を生む伝統的な漢文訓読法を退け,外国語文献を読む本来の方法に則り,中国語で書かれた漢籍を中国語の発音と文法によって読もうとする漢文直読法を,藩校教育の現場で明確に規定し,提唱した意義は大きい。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.106

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.005
Scholarly communication0.0090.003
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0330.028
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)Same topicEducational Robotics and EngineeringFrench-language works237,207