Examination of toxoplasmosis in pregnant women
Bibliographic record
Abstract
About 85-90％ of pregnant women have no antibodies against Toxoplasma gondii in Japan.Primary T. gondii infection is asymptomatic in most patients including pregnant women.Absence of anti -Toxoplasma IgG antibody in pregnant women may result into congenital toxoplasmosis in the fetuses provided the infection which is acquired during pregnancy.The prevalence is supported to be 0.05％ of live births.The various abnormalities include mental retardation, seizures, blindness, deafness and stillbirth including abortion.Therefore, it is important to know the time of infection acquired.Serologic tests are used to diagnose primary infection in pregnant women.IgG antibody arise within 1 -2 weeks after infection and persist lifelong.Detection of Toxoplasma specific IgM antibody indicates recent infection, however, the exact time can not be determined.Measurement of IgG avidity has been used to distinguish the recent infection from the past one.Generally, during pregnancy, it is important to avoid eating raw or undercooked meat, avoid travels abroad especially in France, the USA and Canada, and maintain personal hygiene.キーワード：①先天性トキソプラズマ症、②IgG avidity、③加熱処理不十分な肉食、 ④血清抗体検査、⑤妊婦
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".