Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper reviews several girls’ novels published in the United States （including Canada） during the 19th and the 20th centuries. It also examines how the heroines of girls’ stories are depicted from the perspective of self-reliance and growth, thus showing what American society sought for in girls. Hirono （2023） suggests that some American girls’ stories in the early 20th century have similarity with Jane Eyre（1847） by Charlotte Bronte（1816-55）, where the heroine, Jane, strives for self-reliance without waiting for a prince like Cinderella. Even if the heroines of American girls’ novels face difficulties, they believe in themselves and that they have positive attitudes toward their lives. Moreover, these girls see their home as their safe fort where they can return anytime and try to protect themselves and their family. Thus, the main characters in these girls’ stories are depicted as good models for children's readers. Therefore, it can be said that these girls’ stories are still didactic. However, unlike the early didactic books for children, these girls’ stories have a new style of didacticism because these girls can talk about their wills in their own words and act for their own lives audaciously.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".