MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7145948391

Relationship between the Comprehension of Physical Education Teaching and Good or not Good at Exercises and Sports

2018· article· ja· W7145948391 on OpenAlexaff
誠 雪吹, 香菜子 枝元, Makoto Ibuki, Kanako EDAMOTO

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageja
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPhysical Education and Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsEducation and Early Childhood Development
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComprehensionPhysical educationTeaching method
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

平成29 年7 月に教職課程コアカリキュラムが示され、各教科の指導法において教員養成課程の学生に最低限必要な到達目標が明示された。小学校教員養成課程の学生は、10 教科の教科指導法を修得しなければならない。特に、実技科目である体育科においては、体育ができてもできなくても種目技術などの示範や指導をしなくてはならない。そこで、体育科教育法における理解度の違いは、運動やスポーツの得意不得意で違いがあるのか好き嫌いにおいても違いがあるのか小学校教員養成課程の学生を対象に調査を行った。その結果、学習指導要領理解や指導法の理解において運動・スポーツの得意不得意及び好き嫌いによる差が認められた。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.051
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.051
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)Same topicPhysical Education and PedagogyFrench-language works237,207