Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During the First World War, graphic posters played a very important role for promoting war propaganda as an easy and effective form of medium. War posters provided various messages with pictures to exhort people to share in the war effort. They could affect people's way of thinking both consciously and unconsciously. In commercial advertisement, the hierarchy of effects which make consumers buy products or services is abstracted in AIDAS (Attention, Interest, Desire, Action, Satisfaction) and it is theoretically applicable to propaganda by war posters. Therefore, in order to analyze the process of how these posters worked as a propaganda medium, I will employ the AICAS-Model. Through demonstration of a variety of different procedures used by national war posters to convince the reader, the AICAS-Model is able to summarize the effects of the propaganda. In this paper, I will illustrate how each poster differs in its method of delivering war propaganda, using those made in France, UK, US, Italy, Russia, Canada and Germany.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it